Monday, June 25, 2012
And also with you and your spirit
My wife and I just couldn't get out of bed on Sunday, and missed Mass at our usual community. So, we ended up in a small seaside town up the coast -- at the "mission" church of a larger beach community.
It was a bit of a blast from the past. The ushers were all senior men -- dressed almost identically in shirts and ties and blue blazers. The Eucharistic ministers were mostly women. It was a separation of duties that my parents would have recognized.
But most striking -- at least from the standpoint of our little progressive group -- were the responses. This church tried valiantly to use the new liturgical responses -- "And with your spirit," "It is right and just" and the rest. The new Gloria, with its verbal trip lines and pitfalls, was read from laminated cards placed in the pews.
It was all depressing to me. But not because the new language lacked poetry or because of the sheeplike way the worshipers accepted the changes.
Our own community has struggled with whether to adopt the new language. We have also bought "the cards" and have scheduled debates on the board and with the whole community after Mass. Bottom line: we can't make up our minds about what to do. More accurately, we can't come to a consensus about which way to move forward. Even more to the point, a significant minority doesn't want the changes. And that's enough to keep the group as a whole from moving in any direction. Any direction that to stay right where we are. Where it's safe.
That's partly what affected my mood -- the inability of a couple of hundred good-faith Catholics to get out of their own way. When democracy fails so badly, no wonder some yearn for autocrats.
But I was also saddened by the fight. This language change has been a huge distraction, and raised all sorts of ugly emotions from Catholics. Some are proud to do whatever Rome wants, simply because Rome wants it. Some are blissfully indifferent. Some are irritated that the Vatican's biggest priority -- in an age of shrinking numbers, scandalous behavior and conflicts over basic teaching -- is to tinker with the words of the liturgy. The Mass, once a refuge and a unifying experience, has itself become a battleground. Every time the priest intones "The Lord be with you," worshipers engage in a non-prayerful mental effort to either make sure they recall the new words, "And with your spirit," or to resist them. In which case, they can choose between saying the new words anyway, remaining silent, or defiantly saying "And also with you."
I am tired of the fighting. And of the misplaced priorities, and of the "faith police," tempted to monitor the fidelity of their neighbors. This side of heaven, there may be no getting away from it. But I wish we would stop finding new ways to divide an already divided people.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I just love "Just Love"!
Here's a snippet of some of Farley's "radical" nonsense:
Farley applies criteria for justice to sexual relationships and activities, offering readers a seven-point framework for evaluating whether a sexual relationship is true, loving and just.
The first two norms consider whether the relationship is harmful and whether both partners have freely consented to the relationship. The framework then asks whether the relationship is marked by mutual desire, trust and self-disclosure. Building on that is the norm of equality, which requires that both partners share an equality of power that in no way entails an unequal vulnerability, dependence or limitation of options.
The final three norms consider whether there is a true commitment, which Farley defines as a union marked "by knowing and being known, and loving and being loved." If there is commitment, the question must be asked whether the relationship fulfills the sixth norm of fruitfulness. That is, does the commitment bring about new life by nourishing other relationships and by providing goodness and beauty to the wider community?
Finally, Farley asks whether a relationship is marked by social justice. By social justice, she not only means justice between sexual partners, but respect for all persons in a community. For an individual relationship to be just, it must respect every person's needs for acceptance, well-being and spiritual safety.
Source: http://ncronline.org/blogs/grace-margins/no-justice-margaret-farley-and-just-love
I don't know about you, but this sounds like good stuff.
The NYT sez it's time to abandon ship
I have this sinking feeling that Bil Keller of the New York TImes is right: the barque of Peter is listing hard to starboard. Probably unrecoverable! I'm not sure I have the courage to jump, but I do have my life jacket on and one foot in the liferaft.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/18/opinion/keller-the-rottweilers-rottweiler.html?_r=1&smid=fb-share
Monday, June 04, 2012
All Hail the anti-BC Queen
http://www.salon.com/2012/06/03/birth_controls_worst_enemy/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)