Pages

Monday, January 23, 2012

Unbuckling the Bible Belt

Newt Gingrich's big win in the South Carolina primary this Saturday has me perplexed. What happened to the rigid moralists in the Bible Belt? I used to be able to count on them to hold the scriptural line on morality. It was a line I thought was drawn in the wrong place, but a predictable, unmovable line nonetheless.

What happened, Palmettans?

I mean, I believe in forgiveness and being washed clean in the blood of the Lamb, but this quantity of forgiveness and let-bygones-be-bygones has not been seen since a very bad Friday on Golgotha hill.
Newt, the serial philanderer, and a Catholic, no less! Folks, where are your standards?
The best I can figure is that anti-Romney votes were really anti-vulture capitalist votes. Mitt is still the darling of the 1%, while fellow millionaire and man of the people Gingrich captured a higher percentage of the middle class vote. It's the Republican version of the Occupy movement -- support whoever is running against the mega-millionaire, even if he is also wealthy, morally bankrupt and an opportunist.
Or maybe they are anti-Mormon votes? In the Bible Belt universe, born-agains are the true Church, with Catholics considered honorary Christians at best. Mormons, with their treasure-finding, wife-stealing founder, are hardly on the radar as Christians at all.
Which makes me wonder why wan, super-Catholic Rick Santorum didn't pull more than his 17% of the vote. Maybe if you're going to vote for a Catholic, vote for the guy who can stick it to the media.
At this rate, it's going to be a long strange primary season!

2 comments:

  1. Why is quantity of forgiveness a bad thing? Wouldn't Jesus scoff at the idea that there is a quantifiable limit to how much forgiveness God gives, even to the most lamentable sins?

    Is it worse that people have forgiven him, or worse that they don't see he's a bad person? What makes him a bad person, in jesus' eyes, more than the rest of us, who rack up minor, apolitical sins on a daily basis?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think there's anything wrong with forgiving a lot. We're supposed to forgive over and over.

    But when there is one standard of forgiveness for one's friends and another for one's enemies, I wonder what else is going on.

    These same SC voters never forgave Clinton for his affair. But Newt, their champion, is forgiven without even showing a sign of repentance or regret.

    ReplyDelete