Why are Christians so allergic to it?
Do the ends justify
the means?
Can you break one
commandment in order to fulfill another?
The ongoing furor
over the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, has highlighted for me the tenuous
relationship that some Christians have with the truth. I've noticed that many
of those who are the most fervent in their opposition to the new health care law
are conservative Christians. Aside from the US bishops, who opposed the law
because it would "force" them to pay for contraceptive care, many of
the law's opponents (at least those of my acquaintance) are aligned with
fundamentalist and conservative Christian groups.
Which is fine. If
you don't like Obamacare, that's your business.
But where I have been bewildered is the degree to which these people are
willing to pass along the most absurd and outlandish claims about the effects
of the bill.
The latest has been
the story that the computer sites responsible for signing people up for care
are costing the taxpayer over $660 million! The precise figure, taken from theHotAir, is a whopping $634,320,919! Now, I work in IT. And you could buy an awful
lot of servers, and get a helluva lotta coding and networking done for $600
mill! If this figure were correct, the conservatives' wrath would be justified.
Talk about wasteful spending!
But a little
sleuthing would several things:
- The only news outlets speaking about this figure are far-right, government hating conspiracy sites
- The Republican congressional leadership, which could use all the ammunition it can get to fight O-Care, has not used this figure
- No major news outlets -- CBS, CNN, NPR, etc. -- have run stories on this
- Many of the news outlets carrying the story use very similar titles: "WE PAID $634 MILLION FOR THE OBAMACARE SITES AND ALL WE GOT WAS THIS LOUSY 404," basically meaning that "concerned citizens" were linking over and over to the original story
This doesn't mean
that the story is wrong, of course. You'd have to find out more about the way
the ACA's IT work is being funded. But it certainly raises any number of red
flags about the veracity of the story.
Yet right wing
Christians continue to flog the story as though it was, um, gospel. And I
suspect that the most work they did was to copy the link and paste it into
their news site.
What is this all
about? Do conservative Christians really feel it's OK to lie in the pursuit of
their agenda? Or do they just get really overexcited when they find the perfect
rejoinder to those pesky skeptics and lukewarm Christians who dog them so much
for pesky facts?
No doubt there are
some Christians who feel their lies are a form of civil disobedience to the
forces of evil. If Hitler (sorry Mr. Godwin) were to ask you where the Jews
were hiding, wouldn't you lie and say "I don't know"? I would. But Der Fuehrer aside, are there other people or groups that
Christians would feel honor-bound to mislead? Given the hatred that some of
these have for Democrats and for Obama in particular, I wonder.
But maybe these
Christians are just so convinced of the rightness of their arguments that they
don't look too closely when a news story comes along that fits their
preconceptions. Did pro-choice protesters bring jars of feces into the Texas
Lege? That sounds like the work of monsters who would kill babies. It must be
so! Is Obama planning to shoot millions of US citizens as Glenn Beck recently
claimed? Sure -- the Antichrist would stoop to any evil! But shouldn't the
first red flag about a news story be whether it confirms what you already
believe? I have seen folks on the right and the left fall for this one. Anyone
looking for the truth ought to worry when a story is just too good to be true.
It's a form of moral negligence to pass along stories that paint yourself as
good and your enemies as ungodly.
There's sadness
about this situation on several fronts. First of all, Christians, at least as
much as anyone else, should cherish the truth. After all, they follow the one
who claimed to be "The Way, the Truth and the Life, " and who said "You
shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free." Except under
unusual circumstances, wouldn't honesty
be the best policy for his followers? The other sad aspect of Christians
flirtation with dishonesty is that it makes them pawns in a political game that
does not have their interests at heart. No politician is impervious to
manipulating the masses, But at this point in history, it's the Republican
party that has painted itself as the party of virtue, good stewardship and
patriotism --however much the facts might belie that self-assessment.
Christians have a
duty to find the truth, to protect the truth and the honor the truth. Anything
less puts them in league with the Father of Lies, who has drawn many to
destruction in the supposed pursuit of the good and the holy.
No comments:
Post a Comment